Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Red laws
B) Blue laws
C) True laws
D) Colonial laws
E) Christian laws
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) If a person has been adjudicated insane and has a guardian appointed, that person has no capacity to enter into contracts and any contract he does attempt to enter into is void.
B) If a person has been adjudicated insane and has a guardian appointed, that person has no capacity to enter into contracts and any contract he does attempt to enter into is voidable.
C) If a person has been adjudicated insane and has a guardian appointed, that person retains capacity to enter into contracts so long as the other party to the contract is aware of the guardian's status.
D) If a person has been adjudicated insane and has a guardian appointed, that person retains capacity to enter into contracts so long as the other party to the contract is aware of the insanity issue.
E) If a person has been adjudicated insane and has a guardian appointed, that person retains capacity to enter into contracts so long as the other party to the contract is aware of the guardian's status and also the insanity issue.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) An agreement to commit a crime is enforceable and deemed legal so long as the substance of the agreement was deemed a crime after the agreement was entered into, but an agreement to commit a tort is unenforceable.
B) An agreement to commit a tort is enforceable, but an agreement to commit a crime is unenforceable.
C) An agreement to commit a crime is unenforceable, and an agreement to commit a tort is unenforceable unless a business tort is involved in which case the agreement is enforceable.
D) An agreement to commit a crime is unenforceable, and an agreement to commit a tort is unenforceable unless a privacy tort is involved in which case the agreement is enforceable.
E) An agreement to commit a crime is unenforceable, and an agreement to commit a tort is unenforceable.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Charles is correct in that he could not be legally obligated to commit defamation.
B) Charles is correct only if it can be proven that the defamation would cause Tessa money damages.
C) Charles is correct only if it can be proven that the defamation would cause Tessa actual injury.
D) Charles is correct only if it can be proven that the defamation is undeserved.
E) Charles is correct only if it can be proven that he had a prior relationship with Tessa.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A competition agreement
B) A prohibited competition agreement
C) A covenant not to misappropriate
D) A policy agreement
E) A covenant not to compete
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Executed
B) Enforceable without a fine
C) Illegal and unenforceable
D) Enforceable but with a fine
E) Usury
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Implied ratification
B) Express ratification
C) Express novation
D) Implied novation
E) Express ratification if the statement is in writing but nothing if the statement is only oral
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Morality
B) Popular opinion
C) Medical literature
D) Religion
E) Public policy
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) 18
B) 19
C) 21
D) 16
E) There is not a set age of majority
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court dismissed the lawsuit on the basis that the parents were bound by the Terms of Service and notifications of their original contracts with Apple binding them to future purchases of game currency when their passwords were used.
B) The court dismissed the lawsuit on the basis that the parents were bound by the Terms of Service and notifications of their original contracts with Apple binding them to future purchases of game currency regardless of whether passwords were used.
C) The court dismissed the lawsuit on the basis that no contractual agreement was needed in order for the parents to be bound in regard to purchases of game currency so long as their passwords were used.
D) The court refused to dismiss the lawsuit because no case law was provided to prove that Apple's Terms of Service served as a contract for all subsequent transactions.
E) The court refused to dismiss the lawsuit because as a matter of law parents cannot be required to contractually agree to future purchases by children that are unapproved by the parents.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Emancipated
B) Freed
C) Released
D) Employed
E) Acknowledged
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) So long as, after reaching the age of majority, Sally did not state orally or in writing that she intended to be bound by the contract, then she did not commit an express ratification.
B) Sally was required to expressly ratify the contract before she could be bound to it.
C) An implied ratification occurs when parents agree to accept the debt entered into by a minor.
D) If Sally caused any damage whatsoever to the car, she was said to have impliedly ratified the contract.
E) Sally was required to expressly ratify the contract before she could be bound to it so long as no damage was done; but if she did any damage to the car, as a matter of law, she is said to have impliedly ratified it.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Life insurance, health insurance, and psychological counseling
B) Health insurance and psychological counseling, but not life insurance
C) Psychological counseling, but not health insurance or life insurance
D) Health insurance, but not life insurance or psychological counseling
E) Education loan contracts and psychological counseling, but not life insurance or health insurance
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Ratification
B) Disaffirmance
C) Emancipation
D) Legal release
E) Reaffirmance
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) 50
B) 49
C) 45
D) 30
E) 25
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 21 - 40 of 66
Related Exams