A) Res ipsa loquitur only.
B) Negligence per se only.
C) Assumption of risk only.
D) Res ipsa loquitur and negligence per se.
E) Res ipsa loquitur, negligence per se and assumption of risk.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Assault and battery.
B) Battery.
C) Assault.
D) Justified retribution.
E) Negligence.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Assumption of the risk.
B) Last-clear-chance.
C) Modified comparative negligence.
D) Pure comparative negligence.
E) Both modified comparative negligence and last-clear-chance.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Assumption of the risk.
B) Last-clear-chance.
C) Modified comparative negligence.
D) Pure comparative negligence.
E) Both modified comparative negligence and last-clear-chance.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Trespass to personal property.
B) Conversion.
C) Private nuisance.
D) Negligence.
E) Harassment.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Holly is not the proximate cause of the bank burning because it was not foreseeable that Jeanie would have gasoline in the back of her car that would result in the fire.
B) Holly is not the proximate case of the accident because her actions were not the cause in fact of the accident.
C) Holly's actions were not the proximate cause of the accident because actual causation cannot be established.
D) Holly's actions were the proximate cause of the bank's burning because actual cause is present.
E) Holly's actions were the proximate cause of the bank's burning because cause in fact can be established.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Libel.
B) Slander.
C) Both libel and slander.
D) Neither libel nor slander because an editorial was involved.
E) Neither libel nor slander because the falsehood involved matters of appearance not business-related matters.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Implied assumption of the risk.
B) Express assumption of the risk.
C) Express assumption of the last-clear-chance doctrine.
D) Implied assumption of the last-clear-chance doctrine.
E) Assumption by contract.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Libel.
B) Slander.
C) Both libel and slander.
D) Neither libel nor slander because an editorial was involved.
E) Neither libel nor slander because the falsehood involved matters of appearance not business-related matters.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) When a person causes an object to be placed on the land of another without the landowner's permission.
B) When a person stays on the land of another when the owner tells him to depart.
C) When a person refuses to remove something he placed on the property that the owner of the property asked him remove.
D) When a person causes an object to be placed on the land of another without the landowner's permission, when a person stays on the land of another when the owner tells him to depart, and when a person refuses to remove something he placed on the property that the owner of the property asked him remove.
E) None of these because a person does not commit trespass to realty unless it can be established that the person initially entered the land of another without permission.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Only that the plaintiff's conduct fell below the standard of care needed to prevent unreasonable risk of harm.
B) Only that a failure of the plaintiff was a contributing cause to the plaintiff's injury.
C) Only that the plaintiff violated the last-clear-chance doctrine.
D) That the plaintiff's conduct fell below the standard of care needed to prevent unreasonable risk of harm and also that the plaintiff's failure was a contributing cause to the plaintiff's injuries.
E) That the plaintiff's conduct fell below the standard of care needed to prevent unreasonable risk of harm; that the plaintiff's failure was a contributing cause to the plaintiff's injuries; and also that the plaintiff failed to abide by the last-clear-chance doctrine.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Pain and suffering.
B) Cost to repair damaged property.
C) Medical expenses.
D) Attorney fees.
E) None of these.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Assumption of risk.
B) Last-clear-chance doctrine.
C) Modified risk doctrine.
D) Modified comparative doctrine.
E) There is no such doctrine.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Breach of responsibility.
B) Breach of statute.
C) Breach of duty.
D) Objectionable breaching.
E) Negligent breaching.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Cindy will win on a negligence theory.
B) Cindy will win on both a negligence and strict liability theory.
C) Cindy will lose because she did not incur serious injuries.
D) Cindy will lose because she assumed the risk of injury by coming near the dog.
E) Steven will lose because the assumption of the risk doctrine.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 41 - 60 of 111
Related Exams